Dyer: A small victory in the fight against female genital mutilation

Article content

There was a small victory in The Gambia this week, when a proposed law to legalize female genital mutilation (FGM) was defeated by human rights campaigners. It was a quite small victory, however, because the great majority of little girls in The Gambia are still being mutilated by the professional ‘cutters’ who move from village to village.

The World Health Organization estimates that about 230 million women and girls have undergone this traditional procedure, in which at least the clitoris but often also the inner and outer labia are cut away by a knife or razor, usually without anaesthetics, antiseptics or antibiotics.

Article content

Infections, some of them fatal, are commonplace.

Most girls are ‘circumcised’ in this way in Egypt, Sudan and the Horn of Africa, in the Muslim countries of West Africa, and in Indonesia, usually under the age of five. It is less common in the eastern Arab countries (for example, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Yemen), and rare in Iran, Turkey and Pakistan, but the victims are overwhelmingly Muslims. So are the perpetrators.

This poses a real problem for the anti-FGM campaigners, because most of the people who do this to their girl children are convinced that it is an Islamic practice, or even a religious obligation.  It particularly appeals to men who are obsessed about female ‘chastity’, because it takes the fun out of sex for women, including even masturbation.

These attitudes are common even in the farthest reaches of the Islamic world, like the Muslim-minority parts of Russia. When a 2016 report revealed that the practice is widespread in the mountain villages of Karachayevo-Cherkessia, for example, Ismail Berdiyev, the Mufti of North Caucasus, declared: “All women should be cut, so that there is no depravity on Earth . . .”

Article content

But there’s more to the story than just misogynistic men and weaponized religion. FGM is at least a thousand years older than Islam – it has been found in the mummies of upper-class Egyptian women from 500 BCE — and it is still widespread (more than 50 per cent) among both Coptic Christians in Egypt and Orthodox and Protestant Christians in Ethiopia.

As Sada Mire, an archaeologist of Somali origin and a survivor of FGM, wrote in The Guardian four years ago, “FGM was most likely originally meant as a collective human sacrifice to the gods to avoid a curse from the ancestors.”

“These beliefs were strong and deep-rooted enough to survive first Christianity and then Islam — religions which acknowledged its “cultural” value and simply aligned it with their own concepts of chastity and virginity.”

You can’t get much more deeply rooted than that, so it was no real surprise when the (overwhelmingly male) legislators of The Gambia voted to repeal the 2015 law banning FGM in the country. Most Muslim clerics approved, and the fact that 73 per cent of Gambian women and girls have been cut made no difference: older women are the main enforcers of this custom.

Article content

When the Gambian parliament voted on Monday to maintain the ban on FGM, the members were yielding to the protests of an educated minority at home and of horrified onlookers in other countries. Most Gambians still believe that it is an Islamic religious obligation.

So here is what Islamic religious scholars say on the subject. There is no mention of female circumcision in the Holy Quran, and only five hadiths (reports of what Mohammed actually said) refer to it. None of them states that it is a religious duty.

Why do the hadiths mention it at all? “It is as if Islam deemed it necessary to regulate this practice which was already performed by the Arabs prior to the advent of Islam,” suggests Egyptian Islamist scholar Dr. Mohamed Selim Al-Awa, founding General Secretary of the International Union of Islamic Scholars.

I am no fan of organized religion, but what the world needs now is more and better Islamic scholars.

Gwynne Dyer is an independent journalist based in London, England.

Article content