Other

SVCA submits 2025 budget to municipalities for review

(By Pauline Kerr) In a marathon meeting that went well past its usual 4 p.m. on Nov. 21, Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority’s board of directors approved its draft budget, which … Continue reading SVCA submits 2025 budget to municipalities for review

The post SVCA submits 2025 budget to municipalities for review appeared first on Kincardine Independent.

Other

Thomson Reservoir Remedial Action Project Wraps Up First Season of Construction

Thomson Reservoir Remedial Action Project Wraps Up First Season of Construction
josterme01
Mon, 12/16/2024 – 3:20 pm

Body of water with construction equipment.

Crews place pelletized activated carbon at the Thomson Reservoir during the 2024 construction season. (Credit: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency)

The EPA has completed the first year of construction for the Thomson Reservoir Remedial Action project. This two-year, $35 million project is being conducted under Great Lakes Legacy Act and is funded in partnership with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and a private non-federal partner. The project is the final sediment remediation site on the Minnesota side of the St. Louis River Area of Concern. Completion of this project will progress efforts to remove the Restrictions on Dredging Activities and Degradation of Benthos Beneficial Use Impairments in the AOC, with the eventual goal of delisting the AOC. 

Thomson Reservoir is a 330-acre reservoir with legacy contamination from dioxins/furans in the reservoir’s sediments as a result of decades of industrial pollution. Within the reservoir, sediment contamination was identified in 69 acres totaling 225,000 cubic yards. To address this contamination, 1-2.5 inches of activated carbon will be place in the contaminated areas. The activated carbon will bind to the contamination in the sediment and reduce their bioavailability, preventing contaminants from moving up the food chain.

During the 2024 construction season, crews placed 8,310 tons of activated carbon material over 28 acres of the reservoir. Placement of activated carbon will resume in 2025 to address the remaining 41 acres of contaminated sediment. 

As the reservoir is a popular destination for the public, especially the recreational paddlers who actively use the reservoir and its outfalls, public access to the reservoir has been maintained throughout construction.   Coordination is ongoing with local stakeholders to ensure a safe environment for paddlers who share the water with heavy machinery. Additionally, the reservoir’s parking area was expanded at the start of construction to accommodate needs for both public parking and a construction staging area.

Body of water with construction equipment.

Crews place pelletized activated carbon at the Thomson Reservoir during the 2024 construction season. (Credit: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency)

The EPA has completed the first year of construction for the Thomson Reservoir Remedial Action project. This two-year, $35 million project is being conducted under Great Lakes Legacy Act and is funded in partnership with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and a private non-federal partner. The project is the final sediment remediation site on the Minnesota side of the St. Louis River Area of Concern. Completion of this project will progress efforts to remove the Restrictions on Dredging Activities and Degradation of Benthos Beneficial Use Impairments in the AOC, with the eventual goal of delisting the AOC. 

Thomson Reservoir is a 330-acre reservoir with legacy contamination from dioxins/furans in the reservoir’s sediments as a result of decades of industrial pollution. Within the reservoir, sediment contamination was identified in 69 acres totaling 225,000 cubic yards. To address this contamination, 1-2.5 inches of activated carbon will be place in the contaminated areas. The activated carbon will bind to the contamination in the sediment and reduce their bioavailability, preventing contaminants from moving up the food chain.

During the 2024 construction season, crews placed 8,310 tons of activated carbon material over 28 acres of the reservoir. Placement of activated carbon will resume in 2025 to address the remaining 41 acres of contaminated sediment. 

As the reservoir is a popular destination for the public, especially the recreational paddlers who actively use the reservoir and its outfalls, public access to the reservoir has been maintained throughout construction.   Coordination is ongoing with local stakeholders to ensure a safe environment for paddlers who share the water with heavy machinery. Additionally, the reservoir’s parking area was expanded at the start of construction to accommodate needs for both public parking and a construction staging area.

Other

Final Remaining BUI, Degradation of Benthos, Removed at Muskegon Lake AOC

3 min read

Final Remaining BUI, Degradation of Benthos, Removed at Muskegon Lake AOC
josterme01
Thu, 12/12/2024 – 2:00 pm

Mechanical dredging of contaminated sediment in Ryerson Creek in the Muskegon Lake AOC.

Mechanical dredging of contaminated sediment in Ryerson Creek in the Muskegon Lake AOC.

The U.S. EPA, together with the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE), Water Resources Division (WRD), and Area of Concern (AOC) Program, has removed the Degradation of Benthos BUI from the Muskegon Lake AOC. The BUI was removed on October 31st, 2024, and was the first BUI removed under the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) Action Plan IV. BUIs are designations listed in the 1987 amendment to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA) that represent different types of significant environmental degradation (see Beneficial Use Impairments for the Great Lakes AOCs to learn more).

Muskegon Lake was originally listed as an AOC in 1987 due to historic discharges of industrial and municipal wastewater as well as urban runoff. Elevated levels of contaminants including heavy metals and oils degraded benthic communities by reducing diversity. Since then, 190,000 cubic yards of contaminated sediment in the AOC have been remediated by Great Lakes Legacy Act (GLLA) projects, reducing toxicity that impacted benthic communities. Additionally, seven habitat projects were completed in the AOC, restoring approximately 134 acres of habitat, and removing 110,000 tons of logging-era sawmill debris from the lake. 

The completion of these projects has culminated in the restoration of the AOC and removal of all nine identified BUIs. The October 31, 2024, removal of the Degradation of Benthos BUI marked the ninth and final BUI removal. With all BUIs removed, the Muskegon Lake AOC is now eligible for delisting, a monumental accomplishment in the AOC program. Once an area is delisted, it is no longer considered an AOC as all its once-impaired beneficial uses have been restored. Of 31 U.S. AOCs, only seven have been delisted since the program began in 1987. All but one of these AOCs have been delisted since the GLRI was established in 2010. The delisting process includes the development of a Delisting Report, an invitation to tribes to consult on the delisting recommendation, and a review by the International Joint Commission (IJC) and the public.

The beginning of the delisting process at Muskegon Lake AOC will come on the heels of another recent delisting. Rochester Embayment was delisted on October 3, 2024 following the removal of all 14 of its original BUIs. Each delisting constitutes an historic achievement in the restoration of the Great Lakes and a notable success under both the GLWQA and the GLRI. The proposed future delisting of Muskegon Lake in 2025 would be the eighth delisting of a U.S. AOC and a celebration of decades of hard work by federal, state, and local partners. 

Mechanical dredging of contaminated sediment in Ryerson Creek in the Muskegon Lake AOC.

Mechanical dredging of contaminated sediment in Ryerson Creek in the Muskegon Lake AOC.

The U.S. EPA, together with the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE), Water Resources Division (WRD), and Area of Concern (AOC) Program, has removed the Degradation of Benthos BUI from the Muskegon Lake AOC. The BUI was removed on October 31st, 2024, and was the first BUI removed under the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) Action Plan IV. BUIs are designations listed in the 1987 amendment to the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA) that represent different types of significant environmental degradation (see Beneficial Use Impairments for the Great Lakes AOCs to learn more).

Muskegon Lake was originally listed as an AOC in 1987 due to historic discharges of industrial and municipal wastewater as well as urban runoff. Elevated levels of contaminants including heavy metals and oils degraded benthic communities by reducing diversity. Since then, 190,000 cubic yards of contaminated sediment in the AOC have been remediated by Great Lakes Legacy Act (GLLA) projects, reducing toxicity that impacted benthic communities. Additionally, seven habitat projects were completed in the AOC, restoring approximately 134 acres of habitat, and removing 110,000 tons of logging-era sawmill debris from the lake. 

The completion of these projects has culminated in the restoration of the AOC and removal of all nine identified BUIs. The October 31, 2024, removal of the Degradation of Benthos BUI marked the ninth and final BUI removal. With all BUIs removed, the Muskegon Lake AOC is now eligible for delisting, a monumental accomplishment in the AOC program. Once an area is delisted, it is no longer considered an AOC as all its once-impaired beneficial uses have been restored. Of 31 U.S. AOCs, only seven have been delisted since the program began in 1987. All but one of these AOCs have been delisted since the GLRI was established in 2010. The delisting process includes the development of a Delisting Report, an invitation to tribes to consult on the delisting recommendation, and a review by the International Joint Commission (IJC) and the public.

The beginning of the delisting process at Muskegon Lake AOC will come on the heels of another recent delisting. Rochester Embayment was delisted on October 3, 2024 following the removal of all 14 of its original BUIs. Each delisting constitutes an historic achievement in the restoration of the Great Lakes and a notable success under both the GLWQA and the GLRI. The proposed future delisting of Muskegon Lake in 2025 would be the eighth delisting of a U.S. AOC and a celebration of decades of hard work by federal, state, and local partners. 

Other

Stoney Island may soon re-open, thanks to SVCA

(Contributed by SVCA) Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority (SVCA) has announced that the ash tree removal project at the 98-acre Stoney Island Conservation Area has been successfully completed. During the postal … Continue reading Stoney Island may soon re-open, thanks to SVCA

The post Stoney Island may soon re-open, thanks to SVCA appeared first on Kincardine Independent.

Other

Kincardine piers to remain open all-year

(By Liz Small) At the Nov. 27 Kincardine council meeting, councillors voted to keep the north and south piers at the Kincardine harbour open year-round. During the postal strike, please … Continue reading Kincardine piers to remain open all-year

The post Kincardine piers to remain open all-year appeared first on Kincardine Independent.

Other

The ultimate invader:  USDA Wildlife Services works to minimize feral swine threats to the Great Lakes ecosystem

2 min read

The ultimate invader:  USDA Wildlife Services works to minimize feral swine threats to the Great Lakes ecosystem
josterme01
Tue, 12/03/2024 – 11:53 am

Two feral swine feeding along a  brown leaf covered , forested ridge top.
Feral swine feeding along a ridgetop.
Feral swine feeding along a ridgetop.

Invasive species are defined as plants or animals that are nonnative to an ecosystem and often have broad negative impacts on the environment when introduced. Feral swine (Sus scrofa) may be the ultimate invader. They are cryptic, opportunistic, efficient, and highly adaptable. Feral swine damage to habitats, predation on wildlife, and disease transmission can be linked to the decline of hundreds of native plants and animals in the United States 

The primary methods by which feral swine populations emerge on the landscape are through illegal transportation and release; domestic and agricultural escapes; and escapes from hunting preserves. Each of these pathways highlight the complex challenge in controlling feral swine populations. 

Feral swine damage in a forest ecosystem.

Wildlife Services and their partners continue to operate within the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) to implement on the ground control activities and promote outreach to prevent new introductions of feral swine in Michigan and Ohio. Increased monitoring efforts, coupled with rapid detection and early response, have lowered feral swine densities in Michigan. In Ohio, Wildlife Services has removed one emergent feral swine population and prevented two others from establishing themselves on the landscape.

Thorough surveillance, including the use of camera traps, helicopters, and public outreach has ensured these areas remain feral swine free. Dedicated wildlife damage management efforts like these by USDA Wildlife Services remain important to the conservation of habitat and promotion of native species biodiversity in the Great Lakes ecosystem.

Learn more about how USDA Wildlife Services is managing feral swine damage

Keywords

Other

EPA Announces New 5-Year Plan to Accelerate Restoration of the Great Lakes

2 min read

EPA Announces New 5-Year Plan to Accelerate Restoration of the Great Lakes
josterme01
Fri, 11/29/2024 – 9:22 am

Beach and waterfront landscape with submerged rubble ridges in the water in the foreground
Aerial view of a GLRI project which installed submerged rubble ridges at Illinois Beach State Park. Photo credit: US Army Corps of Engineers
Aerial view of a GLRI project which installed submerged rubble ridges at Illinois Beach State Park. Photo credit: US Army Corps of Engineers

Today, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced an updated action plan for federal agencies and their partners under the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative to restore and protect the Great Lakes over the next five years. The plan was informed by extensive public engagement and consultation with Great Lakes Tribes and states.

Last summer, EPA and its federal partners received more than 3,500 suggestions from the public on priorities for Action Plan IV through five public engagement sessions across the Great Lakes basin and two virtual engagement sessions. In addition, EPA released a draft of the GLRI Action Plan IV for public input earlier this year. Over 40 sets of public input from organizations and individuals were received and incorporated into GLRI Action Plan IV. 

GLRI Action Plan IV

Action Plan IV outlines the GLRI’s priorities and goals for 2025 to 2029 in five focus areas:

  • Toxic Substances and Areas of Concern;
  • Invasive Species;
  • Nonpoint Source Pollution;
  • Habitat and Species; and
  • Foundations for Future Restoration Actions.

The GLRI has been a catalyst for unprecedented federal agency coordination that has accordingly produced unprecedented results. Six U.S. Areas of Concern have been delisted since GLRI’s start and the 24 remaining Areas of Concern have moved dramatically closer to their delisting. This activity reflects a major change from the 25 years before the GLRI, when only one Area of Concern was cleaned up and delisted. GLRI resources have also been used for projects that have prevented over 2.3 million pounds of phosphorus from entering the Great Lakes between 2015 and 2022 and have reduced the phosphorus runoff contribution to harmful algal blooms in western Lake Erie, Saginaw Bay and Green Bay. 

The GLRI also produces economic benefits — a 2018 University of Michigan study showed that every dollar of federal spending on GLRI projects between 2010 and 2016 will produce $3.35 in additional economic activity in the Great Lakes region through 2036.

 In the coming weeks, a web-version of Action Plan IV will be available.

Other

Drop-in at the Bridge gets huge financial boost

(By Liz Small) Drop-in at The Bridge has received a huge financial boost, thanks to an Ontario Trillium Seed Grant, in the amount of $88,000. To read the entire article … Continue reading Drop-in at the Bridge gets huge financial boost

The post Drop-in at the Bridge gets huge financial boost appeared first on Kincardine Independent.

Other

Soil Health Improvements in Western New York Farm Increase Economic Gain for Farmers

2 min read

Soil Health Improvements in Western New York Farm Increase Economic Gain for Farmers
josterme01
Tue, 11/26/2024 – 9:45 am

Working with John Macauley and a Cornell Cooperative Extension Ag Economist, AFT created a partial budget to analyze the marginal benefits and costs of adopting no-till, cover crops, and nutrient management on the Macauley Farm. As a result of the three soil health practices, John’s net income increased by $44 per acre per year or by $25,036 annually on the 567-acre study area, achieving a 135% return on investment.
Working with John Macauley and a Cornell Cooperative Extension Ag Economist, AFT created a partial budget to analyze the marginal benefits and costs of adopting no-till, cover crops, and nutrient management on the Macauley Farm. As a result of the three soil health practices, John’s net income increased by $44 per acre per year or by $25,036 annually on the 567-acre study area, achieving a 135% return on investment.
Working with John Macauley and a Cornell Cooperative Extension Ag Economist, AFT created a partial budget to analyze the marginal benefits and costs of adopting no-till, cover crops, and nutrient management on the Macauley Farm. As a result of the three soil health practices, John’s net income increased by $44 per acre per year or by $25,036 annually on the 567-acre study area, achieving a 135% return on investment.

The Great Lakes are vital, providing drinking water for millions of people, but cropland in the basin contributes to excess nutrients and phosphorus entering the lakes. Farmers care about protecting water quality, but they face challenges in adopting conservation practices due to tight profit margins, concerns about yield impacts, insecure leases, and complexities with integrating conservation into their current management systems. While these practices are crucial for improving soil health and reducing nutrient runoff, farmers also need to see them as practical and profitable to decide to implement them. Through this project, American Farmland Trust (AFT) aimed to encourage farmers in the Genesee River Watershed to adopt soil regenerative management systems. We accomplished this by expanding a farmer-to-farmer demonstration network, gathering and sharing data on the benefits of regenerative agriculture, and fostering better relationships between landowners and farmers. 

One highlight from this project was working with John Macauley of Macauley Farm – a multi-generation beef and crop farm stewarding 1,106 acres in the Genesee River watershed. Through their conservation practices of no-till, planting cover crops, and split fertilizer application, the Macauleys are saving around $72 per acre annually in machinery and labor expenses, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 69 percent. John is also happy to not be picking rocks anymore, which were kicked up by tillage. 

“I am focused on building my soil health and letting nature do some of the work for me,” John says. “I may not be setting records for high yields, but at the end of the day, I’ve got more money in my pocket instead of shelling it all out upfront.”

John believes that continuing to find ways to improve his soil health will provide even greater returns in the future as he experiments with cover crop mixes to supply nutrients, thereby reducing reliance on inorganic N, P, and micronutrients. American Farmland Trust is grateful to have Macauley Farm as a member of the Genesee River Demonstration Farms Network, where John shares his knowledge and experience with his peers to help spread the adoption of soil health practices throughout the watershed.  

To see more examples of economic case studies focused on soil health, and for more information on the Genesee River Demonstration Farm Network please visit our project webpage